Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56446AFD.2050208@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Horiguchi-san, On 2015/11/12 16:10, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: >>> I really don't see why you're fighting on this point. Making this a >>> generic feature will require only a few extra lines of code for FDW >>> authors. If this were going to cause some great inconvenience for FDW >>> authors, then I'd agree it isn't worth it. But I see zero evidence >>> that this is actually the case. >> Really? I think there would be not a little burden on an FDW author; >> when postgres_fdw delegates to the subplan to the remote server, for >> example, it would need to create a remote join query by looking at >> tuples possibly fetched and stored in estate->es_epqTuple[], send the >> query and receive the result during the callback routine. > Do you mind that FDW cannot generate a plan so that make a tuple > from eqpTules then apply fdw_quals from predefined executor > nodes? No. Please see my previous email. Sorry for my unfinished email. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: