Re: Certification
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Certification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5633B92A.2020000@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Certification (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Certification
Re: Certification Re: Certification Re: Certification |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 10/30/2015 12:41 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: >> I think this should be a closed list run by the Linux Foundation. > > Why's that? I'm willing to put up a list we can use for discussion. That's also fine. I just mean "not an @postgresql.org list". >> Because some members of the community have a conflict of interest, I'm >> not certain we can have a certification endorsed by "the whole community". > > Depends on what you call "endorsed". Nobody expects us to say this is the one > and only. I'm just saying that asking the EDB staff to endorse a certification which competes with EDB's certification is not something I personally would do. > >> I would be willing to review the test questions (and suggest some), as >> well as reviewing overall coverage. > > Ok, thanks. BTW we're not talking questions here, but tasks to be performed. Oh, does LF have the ability to administer that kind of test? That would be awesome. >> However, the first question we should have with this is "what problem >> are we solving?" >> >> That is, are the EnterpriseDB/SRA/etc. certifications not good enough? > > At the very least they are not vendor neutral. > >> to make money off PostgreSQL. If there is a deficiency, we need to make >> sure that an LF certification will address that specific deficiency. > > Again, by its very setup I think it solves the major problem. You haven't said what that problem is? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: