Re: pg_amcheck option to install extension
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_amcheck option to install extension |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 563213.1618931367@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_amcheck option to install extension (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_amcheck option to install extension
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > Actually I think the best balance would be to leave things where they > are, and move amcheck to src/extensions/ once the next devel cycle > opens. That way, we avoid the (pretty much pointless) laborious task of > moving pg_amcheck to contrib only to move it back on the next cycle. > What I'm afraid of, if we move pg_amcheck to contrib, is that during the > next cycle people will say that they are both perfectly fine in contrib/ > and so we don't need to move anything anywhere. Indeed. But I'm down on this idea of inventing src/extensions, because then there will constantly be questions about whether FOO belongs in contrib/ or src/extensions/. Unless we just move everything there, and then the question becomes why bother. Sure, "contrib" is kind of a legacy name, but PG is full of legacy names. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: