Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5631.1432130957@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend
Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> +1. I agree that cancelling/killing your own process should not be the
> default behavior.
I think backwards compatibility probably trumps that argument. I have
no objection to providing a different call that behaves this way, but
changing the behavior of existing applications will face a *much*
higher barrier to acceptance. Especially since a real use-case for
the current behavior was shown upthread, which means you can't argue
that it's simply a bug.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: