Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support
Дата
Msg-id 5626C22D.8000302@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support  (Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support  (Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/20/15 9:00 AM, Artur Zakirov wrote:
> Internal representation of the dictionary in the PostgreSQL doesn't
> impose too strict limits on the number of affix rules. There are a
> flagval array, which size must be increased from 256 to 65000.

Is that per dictionary entry, fixed at 64k? That seems pretty excessive, 
if that's the case...
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Typos in comments
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why no CONSTANT for row variables in plpgsql?