Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 562583C6.20501@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/19/15 1:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > What I was trying to say is that if the argument to a USING > option > is NULL then RAISE should skip over it, as if it hadn't > been applied > at all. Similar to how the code currently tests for \0. > > > I understand, but I don't prefer this behave. The NULL is > strange value > and should be signalized. > > > So instead of raising the message we wanted, we throw a completely > different exception? How does that make sense? > > > It is partially wrong because we handle all fields same. It has sense > for "message" fields, and has not sense for other fields. In this case > the text "NULL" will be better. I fail to see how doing HINT: NULL is much better than just not raising a HINT at all... > More to the point, if RAISE operated this way then it would be > trivial to create a fully functional plpgsql wrapper around it. > > > I have a different opinion - better to have propossed function in core. > What I know, the NULL is not use in Postgres as "ignore value", and I am > thinking, it is good idea. Normally I'd agree, but in this case I think it's inline with what the C code is already doing by testing for \0. I suppose if we get the function it's not that bad since at least we get the functionality, so I'll stop arguing it. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: