On 9/30/15 4:31 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 12:02 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>> I wish people would at least consider this as an option because it
>> integrates a ton of different features together. It has *the potential*
>> to eliminate our need to keep maintaining CommitFest and buildfarm and
>> could also replace mediawiki.
>>
>> If people are hell-bent on every tool being separate then fine, but I
>> get the distinct impression that everyone is discarding GitLab out of
>> hand based on completely bogus information.
>
> Well, Gitlab was introduced into this dicussion in the context of being
> an OSS version of Github Issues. If it's more than that, you're going
> to have to explain.
It started as an OSS version of *Github* (not just Github Issues). It
appears to have all the major features of github (issues, code review,
wiki) plus a CI framework.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com