Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 560A64D5.9040308@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-29 05:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Petr Jelinek wrote: >> On 2015-09-02 16:14, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> track_commit_timestamp tracks COMMIT PREPARED as expected in standby server, >>>>> but not in master server. Is this intentional? It should track COMMIT PREPARED >>>>> even in master? Otherwise, we cannot use commit_timestamp feature to check >>>>> the replication lag properly while we use 2PC. >>>> >>>> That sounds like it must be a bug. I think you should add it to the >>>> open items list. >> >> Attached fixes this. It includes advancement of replication origin as well. >> I didn't feel like doing refactor of commit code this late in 9.5 cycle >> though, so I went with the code duplication + note in xact.c. > > Thanks, your proposed behavior looks reasonable. I didn't like the > existing coding nor the fact that with your patch we'd have two copies > of it, so I changed a bit instead to be more understandable. Hopefully I > didn't break too many things. This patch includes the patch for the > other commitTS open item too. > Looks good. It does change the logic slightly - previous code didn't advance session origin lsn if origin timestamp wasn't set, your code does, but I think the new behavior is better. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: