Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ?
От | Mladen Gogala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5608bbca-2bc6-57f1-8bcc-4b5f63eff2f6@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/25/21 13:13, Stephen Frost wrote: > No, it's not- you must also be sure to archive any WAL that's generated > between the pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup and then to be sure and > add into the snapshot the appropriate signal files or recovery.conf, > depending on PG version, to indicate that you're restoring from a backup > and make sure that the WAL is made available via restore_command. > > Just doing stat/stop backup is*not* enough and you run the risk of > having an invalid backup or corruption when you restore. > > If the entire system is on a single volume then you could possibly just > take a snapshot of it (without any start/stop backup stuff) but it's > very risky to do that and then try to do PITR with it because we don't > know where consistency is reached in such a case (we*must* play all the > way through to the end of the WAL which existed at the time of the > snapshot in order to reach consistency). > > In the end though, really, it's much, much, much better to use a proper > backup and archiving tool that's written specifically for PG than to try > and roll your own, using snapshots or not. > > Thanks, > > Stephen Stephen, thank you for correcting me. You, of course, are right. I have erroneously thought that backup of WAL logs is implied because I always back that up. And yes, that needs to be made clear. Regards -- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 https://dbwhisperer.wordpress.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: