Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!

On 24.09.2015 20:23, David Fetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:10:07PM -0600, Ryan Pedela wrote:
>> Kam Lasater wrote:
>>> I'd suggest: Github Issues, Pivotal Tracker or Redmine (probably in
>>> that order). There are tens to hundreds of other great ones out there,
>>> I'm sure one of them would also work.
>>
>> Why not just use Github issues?
>
> Is Github issues something we can run ourselves?
>
> If not, it's a proprietary system which has a proprietor whose
> existence even next month is not guaranteed, and whose interests are
> not guaranteed to align with ours into an indefinite future.
>
> In some very important sense, it does not matter what features a
> system has if it isn't one we can control.  At a minimum, this means
> we need to run it in its entirety on resources we control, and we need
> to be able to patch any piece of it on our own say-so.

+ 1

Instead of Github maybe GitLab is a good choice. There is an open source 
community edition you have the full control over. And it is used by more 
than 100.000 organizations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitLab

Greetings,
Torsten