Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.

On 08/14/2015 06:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Michael Paquier
>>> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Feedback is of course welcome, but note that I am not seriously
>>>> expecting any until we get into 9.6 development cycle and I am adding
>>>> this patch to the next CF.
>>> I have moved this patch to CF 2015-09, as I have enough patches to
>>> take care of for now... Let's focus on Windows support and improvement
>>> of logging for TAP in the first round. That will be already a good
>>> step forward.
>> OK, attached is a new version of this patch, that I have largely
>> reworked to have more user-friendly routines for the tests. The number
>> of tests is still limited still it shows what this facility can do:
>> that's on purpose as it does not make much sense to code a complete
>> and complicated set of tests as long as the core routines are not
>> stable, hence let's focus on that first.
>> I have not done yet tests on Windows, I am expecting some tricks
>> needed for the archive and recovery commands generated for the tests.
> Attached is v3. I have tested and fixed the tests such as they can run
> on Windows. archive_command and restore_command are using Windows'
> copy when needed. There was also a bug with the use of a hot standby
> instead of a warm one, causing test 002 to fail.
> I am rather happy with the shape of this patch now, so feel free to review it...
> Regards,

Michael, I've ran these and it worked fine for me.
See attached patch with a couple of minor fixes.

Amir