Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5601ABC6.50901@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/19/15 10:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> On 7/23/15 6:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> + 2202H E ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLESAMPLE_ARGUMENT invalid_tablesample_argument >>> + 2202G E ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLESAMPLE_REPEAT invalid_tablesample_repeat > >> Where did you get these error codes from? The constants in the SQL >> standard would map to > >> ERRCODE_INVALID_SAMPLE_SIZE >> ERRCODE_INVALID_REPEAT_ARGUMENT_IN_A_SAMPLE_CLAUSE > >> Were you looking at a different standard, or did you intentionally >> choose to rephrase? > > I was looking at SQL:2011. My concern in naming them that way was that > I wanted to have errcodes that would be general enough for any tablesample > extension to use, but still be tablesample-specific, ie I don't want them > to have to fall back on say ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE. Makes sense.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: