Re: pgbouncer logrotate configuration

On 5/13/15 4:55 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/12/15 5:24 PM, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 10:44 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> The pgbouncer logrotate configuration seems a bit contradictory:
>>>
>>> /var/log/pgbouncer.log {
>>>     missingok
>>>     notifempty
>>>     sharedscripts
>>>     copytruncate
>>>     create 0640 pgbouncer pgbouncer
>>>     nodateext
>>>     postrotate
>>>         /bin/kill -HUP `cat /var/run/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.pid
>>> 2>/dev/null` 2> /dev/null || true
>>>     endscript
>>> }
>>>
>>> "create" is ignored if "copytruncate" is used.  And having a postrotate
>>> script to send a HUP signal is also pointless if copytruncate is used.
>>> We need to decide on one way to do it: either copytruncate, or rename
>>> and SIGHUP.
>>>
>>> It also seems to me that this might be a bit simpler if we created a
>>> subdirectory /var/log/pgbouncer/ for all the log files.  Then we
>>> wouldn't have the permissions issues that the "create" directory is
>>> attempting to solve.
>>
>> Just committed a fix for this. Can you please pull 9.4 tree and see
>> whether all problems you reported have been fixed or not? I can push the
>> packages tomorrow or so.
>
> I haven't tested it, but I think the currently committed logrotate file
> won't work at all, because *both* the copytruncate the the postrotate
> script were removed.  You need to keep at least one.
>
> Also, I think the /var/log/pgbouncer/ directory needs to be created
> somewhere in the spec file.

This is still not fixed.