Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56019EE4.3040501@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation (Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/22/2015 01:43 PM, Mark Dilger wrote: >> On Sep 22, 2015, at 6:09 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> >> You are fighting a losing battle. Think of they/them/their/theirs as being indefinitely gendered third person singularpronouns, as well as being third person plural pronouns. Yes it's a relatively new usage, but I don't think its atall unreasonable (speaking as someone who has been known to dislike some new usages and neologisms). It's not at all sloppy.On the contrary, it's quite deliberate. It's just not quite traditional. You need to get over that. > The use of "their" as singular dates back at least as far as Chaucer in the 14th century, prior to > the use of "you" as a singular pronoun. Militant grammarian schoolteachers may have told you > not to use it that way, but that doesn't change the history of its use. > [recipient list trimmed] Good point. In the 18th and 19th centuries it was deemed by some grammarians to be incorrect for some reason, (and yet Thackeray still used it in Vanity Fair, for instance) and now some reactionaries and misogynists are fighting to maintain that somewhat latter day rule. But I'm pretty certain their numbers will dwindle, as they preach to an ever shrinking choir. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: