Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56016D0D.1060201@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in
documentation
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 09/22/2015 10:29 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote: > Oh, good! We're actually going to have this argument? Even though I > said I don't care what you do? > > On 22 September 2015 at 15:11, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net > <mailto:andrew@dunslane.net>> wrote: > > On 09/22/2015 09:25 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote: > > If someone sends me a document that uses "their" in a > singular usage, I will think that person is lazy. That will > continue to be the case, whether people tell me that it's > accepted usage or not. > > > You can think that if you like, > > > Thanks! That's a great relief to me, as I'm sure you can imagine. > > but it's not even remotely true. > > > You just stated that the reason you don't want to use the plural > form I suggested is because it's too hard/time-consuming. That does > suggest you accept that it's a valid solution but you're too lazy to > use it. > > It's a deliberate choice to use a new, perfectly reasonable and > now widely accepted style of which you disapprove, but it's not lazy. > > > That's your opinion; my opinion remains otherwise. It's not > "perfectly reasonable" to abuse the plural because some 1960s > feminazis either misunderstood or didn't like the fact that (because > of history) in English the gender-neutral singular happens to also be > the male singular. > > Happily for me, I can continue to write documents in a grammatically > correct way, and no-one will read them and think I'm a grammar-nazi > (or obstinate, or old-fashioned or whatever) because unless they're > specifically looking for it no-one will notice that I'm avoiding the > contentious usage altogether. On the other hand, there _will_ be a > (perhaps significant) proportion of people who read your documents and > think that you're incapable of writing a grammatically correct sentence. > > Wow, 1960s feminazis, eh? I originally thought you were just a narrow minded, pedantic and antiquated grammarian. Now I realize that's the least of your troubles. Please take your misogyny elsewhere. I hear the Rabid Puppies have openings. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: