Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 560139A7.3090608@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in
documentation
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 22/09/15 22:17, Geoff Winkless wrote: > On 22 September 2015 at 10:52, Gavin Flower > <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz > <mailto:GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>>wrote: > > On 22/09/15 21:33, Geoff Winkless wrote: > > > Without wanting to get into a grammar war, I'm not so sure I > agree that it "condones" it. Dictionaries reflect the current > state of usage, they don't act as arbiters of correctness. The > abuse of "literally" as an emphasiser (which usage is now > listed in the OED) is a prime example. > > I would prefer "his or her" over "their". Perhaps our American > cousins might disagree though. > > I prefer "their" rather than "his or her", it is less clumsy & > there is no point in specifying gender unless it is relevant! > > > I agree in that I prefer "their" in informal speech; however in a > formal document I would find it sloppy. I don't think "his or her" is > inherently clumsy; m > aybe I'm just showing my age. > > Besides, some people are neither, or their biological gender is > ambiguous - so a few people fit into neither the male nor the > female category (depending on precise definitions, about 0.5%)! > > > My understanding is that most intersex (and certainly all trans) > people would identify with one or the other, and even those who don't > select exclusively identify with a mix of both (and would therefore > still be covered by "his or her", no?) although I don't pretend to be > an expert. > > Perhaps it would be easier to avoid the controversy by actually > rewording into the plural, where possible? > > So > > "any user can make such a change for his session." > > becomes > > "Users can make such a change for their individual sessions" > > or similar? > > Geoff To me, the key things is NOT to specify gender, unless it is relevant - and I don't think gender is relevant in describing how to use a database. I was using "Gender Appropriate" language long before the Politically Correct craze started (over 50 years ago)! I was told references to "he" in rules included females, which I thought was daft! Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: