Re: A better translation version of Chinese for psql/po/zh_CN.po file
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A better translation version of Chinese for psql/po/zh_CN.po file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55FE3B15.4000101@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A better translation version of Chinese for psql/po/zh_CN.po file (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A better translation version of Chinese forpsql/po/zh_CN.po file
|
Список | pgsql-translators |
On 9/4/15 1:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Rugal Bernstein wrote: >> Hi all, >> Sorry for the later response. I am not familiar with the commit procedure. >> I am here to raise this patch again in the 2015-11 commitfest. >> Still the same, I am pretty confident with my translation. I guarantee it >> is very orthodox and much more native than the TW version. > > Hi, > > Please have a look at this website: https://babel.postgresql.org/ > In there, you will find a lot of information about the current status of > the translation of all the various branches for the language, as well as > a git repository that you can clone. The repository contains branches > for each active Postgres branch. > > The methodology I recommend you follow is to download a .po file from > the website, then use it as a base to apply your new translations. > > I just pushed your translation to the master branch (which is for > Postgres 9.5) -- to do so, I downloaded > https://babel.postgresql.org/po-current/psql-zh_CN.po (linked in the > website) then ran "msgmerge your-file.po psql-zh_CN.po", then committed > that as the new version of psql/zh_CN.po. If I interpret the rest of this thread correctly, then the proposed changes were to make the style more suitable for TW. I don't know if updating the CN file was correct.
В списке pgsql-translators по дате отправления: