Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY
От | Charles Clavadetscher |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55F58771.7040001@swisspug.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY (Charles Clavadetscher <clavadetscher@swisspug.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen On 13/09/2015 15:26, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: > Hello Stephen > > On 13/09/2015 14:49, Stephen Frost wrote: >> Charles, >> >> Just FYI, on these lists, we'd prefer it if you wouldn't top-post. >> >> * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetscher@swisspug.org) wrote: >>> Yes, of course. I will take care of that and send a new patch. >> Thanks! >> >>> Who will then git push it? >> I'd be happy to take care of it, though any of the committers may pick >> it up, of course. If there's a concern about the patch being missed or >> forgotten then it can be added to the commitfest system (here: >> http://commitfest.postgresql.org). I don't believe there's a risk of >> that here, but you're welcome to add it if you'd like, of course. >> >>> Thank you for your feedback. >> Thank you for working on this! >> >> Stephen > In the attachement the new patch. I was not able to create one with both > commits so I also added the first one. > I think that documentation should be as complete as possible, but if you > say that there is no risk in missing the update, then I don't see a need > to add a line in the commitfest. > > Thank you also for the hint on top-posting. I was not aware of that. > Have a good Sunday. > Charles I noticed that the position of the parameter "policy_name" in the description list of parameters was not at the (alphabetically) correct position. I changed that and the result is attached. I think/hope that is now all correct. Thank you and bye Charles
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: