Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Rework access method interface |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55EDDF44.10408@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Rework access method interface (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-07 20:56, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com > > However I don't like the naming differences between validate_opclass > and amvalidate. If you expect that the current amvalidate will only > be used for opclass validation then it should be renamed accordingly. > > > I'm not yet sure if we need separate validation of opfamilies. > Well either the amvalidate or the validate_opclass should be renamed IMHO, depending on which way the checking goes (one interface for everything with generic name or multiple interfaces for multiple validations). -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: