Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55EC7B17.7080203@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-09-06 19:05, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > Here is a rebased two-part v11. > >> function parameters are always in the same line as the function name > > ISTM that I did that, or maybe I did not understand what I've done wrong. > I see one instance of this issue +static int +NextBufferToWrite( + TableSpaceCheckpointStatus *spcStatus, int nb_spaces, + int *pspace, int num_to_write, int num_written) Also +static int bufcmp(const void * pa, const void * pb) +{ should IMHO be formatted as +static int +bufcmp(const void * pa, const void * pb) +{ And I think we generally put the struct typedefs at the top of the C file and don't mix them with function definitions (I am talking about the TableSpaceCheckpointStatus and TableSpaceCountEntry). -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: