Re: Strange TRIGGER failure with FOR ... IN ... LOOP ... INSERT
| От | Adrian Klaver |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Strange TRIGGER failure with FOR ... IN ... LOOP ... INSERT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 55DF1372.6000205@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Strange TRIGGER failure with FOR ... IN ... LOOP ... INSERT (Christopher BROWN <brown@reflexe.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Strange TRIGGER failure with FOR ... IN ... LOOP ... INSERT
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/27/2015 06:33 AM, Christopher BROWN wrote: > Hello Adrian, > > Yep, Charles' explanation helped me understand what was going on. > Before that, I was as confused as you were (in your first reply) about > how access_mode could be NULL (with the same reasoning). In any case, > thanks for your links ; I did try searching the web for the answer > before posting, but got too many irrelevant results given that I had to > search using very common terms. Yeah, I did not get Charles's second post until I sent my second, so it was redundant. > > I've concluded the the RECORD type is the best-fit for my approach. I > don't know if it's any faster that using SELECT * with a specific > %ROWTYPE given that the data doesn't go anywhere outside the function > body. I don't know if the order in which columns are returned (by > either SELECT * or using explicit column names matters when using > %ROWTYPE), although I'll assume that PostgreSQL is smart enough to match > things up correctly, if I need to write a function that returns > instances of any given %ROWTYPE in the future. I don't know, I have always just used SELECT * as I needed all the columns anyway. > > Thanks again. > Christopher > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: