Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55DD9756.8080600@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015/08/26 18:01, Kouhei Kaigai wrote: >>> You may think execution of alternative plan is the best way for EPQ rechecks, >>> however, other folks may think their own implementation is the best for EPQ >>> rechecks. I never argue which approach is better. >>> What I point out is freedom/flexibility of implementation choice. Maybe my explanation was not accurate, but I just want to know use cases, to understand the need to provide the flexiblity. > The only and significant point I repeatedly emphasized is, it is developer's > choice thus it is important to provide options for developers. > If they want, FDW developer can follow the manner of alternative plan > execution for EPQ rechecks. I never deny your idea, but should be one of > the options we can take. I don't object about your idea either, but I have a concern about that; it looks like that the more flexiblity we provide, the more the FDWs implementing their own EPQ would be subject to an internal change in the core. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: