Re: Declarative partitioning
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Declarative partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55D6BC88.4010101@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Declarative partitioning (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Declarative partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-21 AM 06:27, David Fetter wrote: >> By the last sentence, do you mean only UPDATEs to the partition key that >> cause rows to jump partitions or simply any UPDATEs to the partition key? > > I don't know what Simon had in mind, but it seems to me that we have > the following in descending order of convenience to users, and I > presume, descending order of difficulty of implementation: > > 1. Updates propagate transparently, moving rows between partitions if needed. > > 2. Updates fail only if the change to a partition key would cause the > row to have to move to another partition. > > 3. All updates to the partition key fail. > I was thinking I'd implement 2. There was some discussion last year[1] about how 1 could be realized. Thanks, Amit [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140829172216.GF10109@awork2.anarazel.de
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: