Re: Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan
Дата
Msg-id 55D4E242.4070804@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan  (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Ответы Re: Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/18/2015 04:40 PM, Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> Attached please find the WIP patch and also the ANALYZE results.
> Notes: the patch may not directly apply to head as some network issue
> here so my Linux box can't talk to git server.

So, one of the things we previously mentioned is that currently many
users deliberately use CTEs as an optimization barrier in order to force
the planner.  Given that, we need some kind of option to force the old
behavior; either SQL syntax or a GUC option.  Otherwise this will cause
a bunch of backwards-compatibility breakage.

Ideas?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Make HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC more concurrent
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Declarative partitioning