Re: First-class Polymorphic joins?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First-class Polymorphic joins? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55CD3B20.6040502@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | First-class Polymorphic joins? (Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2015 05:23 PM, Guyren Howe wrote: > It surprises me that no SQL database to my knowledge has polymorphic joins as a first-class feature. > > A polymorphic join is where a fk contains not just an id but an indicator of which table it refers to. I am pretty sure it already does that: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/sql-createtable.html REFERENCES reftable [ ( refcolumn ) ] So you could have a "tags" table, that can attach tags to any of a variety of other tables. Rails handles this by including the table name as a string. > > This seems a reasonable thing to want to do, and it seems that the database could handle it by combining the fields fromthe target tables in the result. > > I also think migrations ought to be a first-class feature… So is this the push the ORM into the database day? > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: