Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
| От | Martín Marqués |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 55CD07A3.3030209@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 ("Wayne E. Seguin" <wayneeseguin@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
El 13/08/15 a las 14:37, Wayne E. Seguin escribió: > The question is specifically about the replication feature mentioned here > http://www.pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page for the purposes of > failing over minimizing downtime. They aim a completely different problems. The thing Joshua mentioned about BDR being *async* means that data will be *eventually* consistent. This tackles the problem with nodes which are distant (one node in London, another in NY, one in Tokio, ...) PgPools replication_mode is for nodes on a local network. It would never scale like BDR with geographically distant nodes. Conclusion, they don't solve the same problem, so it's hard to compare. Cheers, -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: