Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55CCC5A5.4090103@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 ("Wayne E. Seguin" <wayneeseguin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2015 08:52 AM, Wayne E. Seguin wrote: > "BDR is only one in Beta compare to stable options: > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling. > Not sure why this solution would be chosen. Experience with pgpool is > that you only needed to change a port and no SQL changes required on an > application side." > > I appreciate any input as to pros/cons of BDR vs PGPool-II v3 in this BDR is async multi master. PGPool is largely just a connection pooler with load balancing (although it has other features). They play different sports. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: