Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
От | Jesper Pedersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55C4C115.9070101@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/07/2015 12:41 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> OK, committed. >> > > Thank you. > Fyi, there is something in pgbench that has caused a testing regression - havn't tracked down what yet. Against 9.6 server (846f8c9483a8f31e45bf949db1721706a2765771) 9.6 pgbench: ------------ progress: 10.0 s, 53525.0 tps, lat 1.485 ms stddev 0.523 progress: 20.0 s, 15750.6 tps, lat 5.077 ms stddev 1.950 ... progress: 300.0 s, 15636.9 tps, lat 5.114 ms stddev 1.989 9.5 pgbench: ------------ progress: 10.0 s, 50119.5 tps, lat 1.587 ms stddev 0.576 progress: 20.0 s, 51413.1 tps, lat 1.555 ms stddev 0.553 ... progress: 300.0 s, 52951.6 tps, lat 1.509 ms stddev 0.657 Both done with -c 80 -j 80 -M prepared -P 10 -T 300. Just thought I would post it in this thread, because this change does help on the performance numbers compared to 9.5 :) Best regards, Jesper
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: