Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Дата
Msg-id 55C24EA8.2050901@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/05/2015 10:46 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 1. Add the functions as a builtins.
>    This is what the current patch does.  Simon seems to prefer this,
>    because he wants the function to be always available in production;
>    but I don't like this option because adding functions as builtins
>    makes it impossible to move later to extensions.
>    Bruce doesn't like this option either.

Why would we want to move them later to extensions?  Do you anticipate
not needing them in the future?  If we don't need them in the future,
why would they continue to exist at all?

I'm really not getting this.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6