Re: executeBatch() and operation after error
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: executeBatch() and operation after error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55C00BEC-5B33-4358-875E-51A34D217071@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | executeBatch() and operation after error ("Heiko W.Rupp" <heiko.rupp@redhat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 15-Jan-07, at 6:13 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote: > Hi, > > JDBC 3.0 spec speifies that in 15.1.3 a driver may continue > processing statements in a batch > if one of the statements throws an error. > > Is this supported by the current driver? If yes, how can I enable > this? A cursory examination of the code suggests not. > > I have a use case where most of the time my application would very > much benefit from > using batches, but where sometimes the data to be inserted is > already there. > > Of course there is the workaround to check for a BatchException and > then doing a > getUpdateCounts() to fall back inserting everyhing 'by hand'. But > obviously it is desirable > for e.g. a batch of 10 to only process statement #2 if this is > failing and having all other > statements be treated by the batching Given the semantics of postgresql transactions this would be onerous to implement. If a single statement fails in a transaction subsequent statements fail. Dave > > Heiko > > > -- > Heiko W.Rupp > heiko.rupp@redhat.com, http://www.dpunkt.de/buch/3-89864-429-4.html > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: