Re: TAP tests are badly named

On 07/30/2015 12:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> We should describe test sets by what they test, not by how they test. 
> TAP is a testing tool/protocol. The current set of tests we have test 
> the programs in src/bin, and we should really name the test set by a 
> name that reflects that, rather than the fact that we are using TAP 
> tools to run the tests. What if we decide to test something else using 
> TAP? Would we call that set of tests TAP tests too?
>
> --enable-tap-tests is a reasonable configuration setting, because it's 
> about whether or not we have a TAP testing framework available, but I 
> think we should stop calling the bin tests "TAP tests" and we should 
> change the test name in vcregress.pl to a more appropriate name. In 
> the buildfarm I'm calling the step "bin-check": 
> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2015-07-30%2012%3A25%3A58&stg=bin-check>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>


In fact, looking more closely at the changes that have been made to 
vcregress.pl, I don't really like the way this has been done. I'm 
putting together some changes to bring things more into line with how 
the Makefiles work.

cheers

andrew