Re: 64-bit XIDs again
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit XIDs again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55BA33B3.3030507@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 64-bit XIDs again (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit XIDs again
Re: 64-bit XIDs again Re: 64-bit XIDs again |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/30/2015 04:26 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > Also, I think it's possible to migrate to 64-bit XIDs without breaking > pg_upgrade. Old tuples can be leaved with 32-bit XIDs while new tuples > would be created with 64-bit XIDs. We can use free bits in t_infomask2 to > distinguish old and new formats. I think we should move to 64-bit XIDs in in-memory structs snapshots, proc array etc. And expand clog to handle 64-bit XIDs. But keep the xmin/xmax fields on heap pages at 32-bits, and add an epoch-like field to the page header so that logically the xmin/xmax fields on the page are 64 bits wide, but physically stored in 32 bits. That's possible as long as no two XIDs on the same page are more than 2^31 XIDs apart. So you still need to freeze old tuples on the page when that's about to happen, but it would make it possible to have more than 2^32 XID transactions in the clog. You'd never be forced to do anti-wraparound vacuums, you could just let the clog grow arbitrarily large. There is a big downside to expanding xmin/xmax to 64 bits: it takes space. More space means more memory needed for caching, more memory bandwidth, more I/O, etc. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: