Re: more RLS oversights
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: more RLS oversights |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55B93E31.6060300@crunchydata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: more RLS oversights (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: more RLS oversights
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/29/2015 01:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I think this reads a bit funny. What's a "POLICY USING" clause? I >> expect that translators will treat the two words POLICY USING as a >> single token, and the result is not going to make any sense. >> >> Maybe "in a policy's USING and WITH CHECK expressions", or perhaps "in >> policies's USING and WITH CHECK exprs", not sure. > > Yeah, I don't see why we would capitalize POLICY there. The equivalent message for functions is: ".. are not allowed in functions in FROM" So how does this sound: "... are not allowed in policies in USING and WITH CHECK expressions" or perhaps more simply: "... are not allowed in policies in USING and WITH CHECK" Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: