Re: pgsql: Plug RLS related information leak in pg_stats view.
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Plug RLS related information leak in pg_stats view. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55B7ECDF.1040600@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Plug RLS related information leak in pg_stats view. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/2015 01:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: >> Plug RLS related information leak in pg_stats view. > > BTW, a note about this: I see you bumped catversion in both > branches, which is good, but you bumped it to the same thing, which > I think is bad. Two branches with different initial catalog > contents should not have identical catversions; that more or less > defeats the point of having the version number. > > What I've done in such cases is to assign yyyymmdd1 to the back > branch and yyyymmdd2 to HEAD. Ok -- good point. I'll bump HEAD - -- Joe Conway -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVt+zfAAoJEDfy90M199hl5t4P/36ZHW4MMzwXVWU6SgrKDrI9 +6PTpKdigH85OvpMYoiiU5bITz6E2hHAVGkqHbCLwacQiEiZzRPEV3RSAXCCq5Gn 9ARHurQyb89N8wS3f030gRtXEDbY+f8aUpB9DlZuzUPqD2D1XsIgYKm1jTVFRcT/ 7/iXiLQ5lLYNgOcrZVS89THOjcm+IdwGoSm16J6Kd8cte9qmhbeJuLn7poQGXl9D TwMX6UVWqxufFWD6IGodbpnOw3frYrGTIKSbLMTnj4YaY0hs284xa8ogIGZ4+Tze FSCDkyh8u5g0VD1uS7ose4hI18VOiO+KNUvzONg/rtuYymR96jCKK49FgjQfE3ud zsOdsicr8Lx3Z14mWFNJmLtqvtiJ2Px9tCxVuxXb1JNI+kuwJoyBrVh0eNjEeJuS S38H5OVieYGkhTG6ZFm3aGDUkMY3OWgpwPyncWq0mN0eyYReEBRGn3BD48G7mg2Z BqhoDMeLvOP0qwwYUDutJk3Y2dPvah8VUQFMjqpWnQEcm7M0FCagkMC6pDKUppFL Z8L3JmRNLdiF2cxCNc3EyELvWjDhr24mlhT2pjZQKWLlUiMJh0w3omfdwQB0g4qo g2Yr/BG2D3rgzDiQLmR3DkNyP7Wy9PgQhUmWAnjzqHgfnsclWMQS1blIZhfyeIUk Mm3RnJ2nTES55pP4KDOi =4Okg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: