Re: A little RLS oversight?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A little RLS oversight? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55B666BE.6010401@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A little RLS oversight? (Joe Conway <joe.conway@crunchydata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A little RLS oversight?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/27/2015 10:03 AM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 07/26/2015 07:59 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 07/26/2015 07:19 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote: >>> Attached is an updated patch (still needs some docs for the >>> functions). >> >> Thanks for that. I'll add the docs. > > Documentation added. Also added comment to check_enable_rls about > passing InvalidOid versus GetUserId(). > > I believe this is ready to go -- any other comments? Strike that - now I really think it is ready to go :-) In this patch I additionally changed instances of: check_enable_rls(indrelid, GetUserId(), true) to check_enable_rls(indrelid, InvalidOid, true) per Dean's earlier remark and my new comment. - -- Joe Conway -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVtma+AAoJEDfy90M199hl01wP+wYTV6VfBbpVEVf2+ZmbQlbJ pgquLXkXsZ9vdsw/jY09+7HKwVQFjqq+E3zjqj/Pn9Q0h17cgflPuYSvde30Mb+l 86zVD5oKLttFlCb9Ablbauc8FoYTud3D+fJkGwDPBYh5VeIlFRwQMRSKQRxKHFfr PvXmv3z7TmYGBe7dLEl24WyGncOtsJxPiHZDYA5Cna7lG+jlHqVIDz5itu6xGHgy OOLfr07aZX3Bt9zmzg1NdxcBZNc6NkSVtKFzkqrJ+rCIcoMFxyIWsVp2IAEOItFI o7hNEqrRk8yMcyX+Ej7K/6arOqCjQ6+RT+tJarCNDPv7WRXwt4PInircCjswt+uX /vMM7zhzhrW+BMc2rbkU4TKfcEfI78SxUh3jKRTMbUWM6UJPZ+ca1mo6EQGNhUaS mOMnpPD+huKXZpKlAC1ImH1boFPYqf9de6ToQRIdm7GKLUhKK8llWg3wC2GwMrtq JDojJhPUohhofMaU7YjokJWx0vAa3NckgCO4nmYvL5Sc36+QUDlW4Amm43el7PvB SkD2B0AvLZFmMJlrh3eAnuDleXzjRmVc1WoJtGGT2qwmL9oSDtT6y4Uh+0VnDJkh T7XJ1NgvwFGNzG/heVTv346Mah2wRl/4A43jpojzQLjbNZ7t2gi8h9DkanA7/iGK JOmMBbIfVlKnT+SKEOVJ =WZhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: