Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
| От | Daniel Gustafsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 55B64E31-A6E6-4805-9650-AE3A78A2DF34@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
> On 18 Aug 2021, at 15:46, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >>>> On 18 Aug 2021, at 13:44, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> I think this both of these things could be deleted and we could get rid of the --quiet option, to simplify all this. >> >>> It simplifies the pg_amcheck code a bit, but it at the same time complicates >>> the tests as they are currently written. Not sure that we want to change that >>> much as this point in the 14 cycle? >> >> It's going to become much harder to change pg_amcheck's user-visible >> behavior once it's shipped in a release. Better to fix it now while >> there are not backwards-compatibility concerns. > > +<several>. Let's just get it done now. I doubt many people have had > the time to integrate it into their scripts and such yet, and since > it's a beta... Since there is consensus for removing --quiet, I’ll propose a patch in a bit for removing it and fixing up the tests. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: