Re: BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN used nowhere (infra part of on-line checksum switcher)
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN used nowhere (infra part of on-line checksum switcher) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55B47F0A-3103-4EDE-A2EC-87972E4E9357@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN used nowhere (infra part of on-linechecksum switcher) (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN used nowhere (infra part of on-linechecksum switcher)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 22 Apr 2018, at 14:04, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz <mailto:michael@paquier.xyz>> wrote: > Hi all, > > BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN has been added by commit eed1ce7, which is an > infrastructure piece to be able to enable and disable dynamically > checksums on a cluster. The main idea is to be able to bypass > datallowconn which allows a background worker to connect to a database > even if the database is set to refuse connections so as its checksums > can be calculated and updated. > > At the end, the dynamic switch for checksums has been reverted as of > a228cc13, and a set of rather-used APIs have been changed for what looks > like no reason now: > - BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection > - BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid > - InitPostgres > So all background workers would not be able to compile because of that. > Would we want to drop this unused interface or keep it? > > Even if this is not removed, bgworker.sgml needs to be updated with the > new definition of BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection and > BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnectionByOid which are missing the third > argument "uint32 flags", as well as the description for > BGWORKER_BYPASS_ALLOWCONN. I can personally see more reasons to revert > that portion as well and consider it again for v12 or onwards if the > on-line checksum switch is proposed again. > > Magnus, Daniel, what do you think? > > I think this feature is definitely worth keeping, regardless. It's useful elsewhere, in externally maintained bgwriters. +1, I think this is worth keeping in for 11. cheers ./daniel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: