Re: Materialized Views
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized Views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55B094DD.1070803@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Materialized Views (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Materialized Views
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
On 07/23/2015 05:37 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Jean-Marc Guazzo <jmguazzo@gmail.com> wrote: >> Materialized Views aren't visible when I try to link them with MS Access, MS >> Excel or LibreOffice Base. > > There is the same problem with foreign tables actually. > >> I guess that's because the ODBC driver doesn't return this information... >> >> Can you tell me whether there will be some adjustement in the next version >> of the odbc driver regarding the MVs ? > > Hard to say... The following patch is not loved enough I am afraid: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqR0apHpiPAi4J2e3oR2jZ8MREyJAzxdWMjrr4h5PsRp4w@mail.gmail.com Ah, that patch. No-one investigated what e.g. SQL Server returns in the table type column for materialized views. Or what DB2 returns for federated tables. While the specification gives us free hands to return an implementation-specific string, it'd be good to use what the other DBMS's use. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: