Re: pg_basebackup and replication slots
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup and replication slots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55AEEEB4.7020300@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup and replication slots (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup and replication slots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/2/15 3:37 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Regarding patch 3, I have more comments: > 1) I think that documentation should clearly mention that if -R and -S > are used together, a primary_slot_name entry is added in the > recovery.conf generated with the slot name defined. Updated proposal attached. > 2) > sub psql > { > my ($dbname, $sql) = @_; > - run [ 'psql', '-X', '-q', '-d', $dbname, '-f', '-' ], '<', \$sql or die; > + my ($stdout, $stderr); > + run [ 'psql', '-X', '-A', '-t', '-q', '-d', $dbname, '-f', '-' > ], '<', \$sql, '>', \$stdout, '2>', \$stderr or die; > + chomp $stdout; > + return $stdout; > } > RewindTest.pm has a routine called check_query defined. I would be > great to extend a bit more psql than what I thought previously by > returning from it ($result, $stdout, $strerr) and make check_query > directly use it. This way we have a unique interface to run psql and > capture output. I don't mind writing this refactoring patch on top of > your set if that's necessary. Let's do that as a separate patch. Adding multiple return values makes calling awkward, so I'd like to sort out the actual use cases before we do that. > 3) > +command_ok([ 'pg_basebackup', '-D', "$tempdir/backupxs_sl_R", '-X', > 'stream', '-S', 'slot1', '-R' ], > + 'pg_basebackup with replication slot and -R runs'); > +$recovery_conf = slurp_file "$tempdir/backupR/recovery.conf"; > +like(slurp_file("$tempdir/backupxs_sl_R/recovery.conf"), > slurp_file is slurping an incorrect file and $recovery_conf is used > nowhere after, so you could simply remove this line. Yeah, that was some leftover garbage.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: