Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 559B9ACC.2060103@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-07-04 13:45, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> Well for indexes you don't really need to add the new AT command, as >> IndexStmt has char *idxcomment which it will automatically uses as comment >> if not NULL. While I am not huge fan of the idxcomment it doesn't seem to >> be easy to remove it in the future and it's what transformTableLikeClause >> uses so it might be good to be consistent with that. > > Oh, right, I completely missed your point and this field in IndexStmt. > Yes it is better to be consistent in this case and to use it. It makes > as well the code easier to follow. > Btw, regarding the new AT routines, I am getting find of them, it > makes easier to follow which command is added where in the command > queues. > > Updated patch attached. > Cool, I am happy with the patch now. Marking as ready for committer. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: