Re: 9.5 alpha: some small comments on BRIN and btree_gin
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 alpha: some small comments on BRIN and btree_gin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 559B178B.6070101@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 9.5 alpha: some small comments on BRIN and btree_gin (Marc Mamin <M.Mamin@intershop.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.5 alpha: some small comments on BRIN and btree_gin
Re: 9.5 alpha: some small comments on BRIN and btree_gin |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/06/2015 12:20 AM, Marc Mamin wrote: > There seems to be no "fence" against useless BRIN indexes that would allow a fallback on a table scan. > But the time overhead remind small :) When have we ever stopped users from creating useless indexes? For one thing, just because the index isn't useful *now* doesn't mean it won't be in the future. Now, it would be useful to have a brin_index_effectiveness() function so that DBAs could check for themselves whether they should dump indexes. However, I don't see needing that for 9.5. Are there usage stats in pg_stat_user_indexes for BRIN? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: