Re: Does VACUUM FULL need ANALYZE ?
От | Eoin O'Hehir |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does VACUUM FULL need ANALYZE ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5590F70C.3040004@clavistechnology.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does VACUUM FULL need ANALYZE ? (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Thanks Kevin. That provides a lot of clarity. Cheers. On 26/06/15 20:40, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Eoin O'Hehir <eoin.ohehir@clavisinsight.com> wrote: > >> I'm setting up a weekly DB maintenance job for a 9.3 server. >> >> Part of this will be a VACUUM FULL. > That's something to seriously reconsider. > >> Is there any point in adding the ANALYZE option to the command ? > That and a non-FULL VACUUM command after VACUUM FULL. Unlike what > you might expect based on the FULL option, a VACUUM FULL does not > do everything that a non-FULL VACUUM does, and actually drops any > existing visibility map and free space map -- potentially making > subsequent queries against the table slower until a normal VACUUM > (or autovacuum occurs). I strongly recommend that if you really do > need to use VACUUM FULL, you immediately follow it with VACUUM > ANALYZE. > > You might also want to read this: > > http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2014/03/vacuum-full-doesnt-mean-vacuum-but.html > > -- > Kevin Grittner > EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: