Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55905124.7010206@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/26/2015 10:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-06-26 15:07:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> I realize that the recent fsync fiasco demonstrated that people keep >> files not readable by PG in the data directory > > It wasn't unreadable files that were the primary problem, it was files > with read only permissions, no? Right. >> "oops, I can't read this, that's probably OK" just does not seem good >> enough. > > Agreed. After thinking about this some more, I think it'd be acceptable if we just fail, if there are any non-writeable files in the data directory. The typical scenario is that postgresql.conf, or an SSL cert file, is a symlink to outside the data directory. It seems reasonable to require that the DBA just removes the symlink before running pg_rewind, and restores it afterwards if appropriate. In many cases, you would *not* want to overwrite your config files, SSL cert files, etc., so the DBA will need to script backing up and restoring those anyway. (It's a fair question whether pg_rewind should be copying those files in the first place. I've opted for "yes", so that it's easy to explain the behaviour of pg_rewind: the end result is the same as if you took a new base backup from the source server. Whatever files you want to backup up before you re-initialize from a base backup, you should also backup with pg_rewind.) But we'll still need to handle the pg_xlog symlink case somehow. Perhaps it would be enough to special-case pg_xlog for now. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: