Re: Hash index creation warning
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash index creation warning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5588A309.50301@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash index creation warning (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash index creation warning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/12/15 5:00 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > On 18 October 2014 at 15:36, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:36:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:56:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> The question is whether we explain the implications of not being WAL-logged >>>>> in an error message or simply state the fact and let the documentation >>>>> explain the hazards - basically just output: >>>>> "hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged" >>>> >>>> +1. The warning message is not the place to be trying to explain all the >>>> details. >>> >>> OK, updated patch attached. >> >> Patch applied. > > I only just noticed this item when I read the release notes. Should > we bother warning when used on an unlogged table? Not really; but I think the bigger question at this point is if we want to change it this late in the game. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: