Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5584.1207849694@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: > Both GIN and GiST make a call of transformation function before indexing value. > I suppose, there is no automatic way to set this flag even in case when type of > storage and type of indexing value are the same. > So, I see three variant: > - add flag in pg_am > - add flag to create operator class and by default it should point to > impossibility to get value from index. At least for GIN and GiST. Yeah, just as messy as I feared :-(. My inclination for the first pass would be to just make it a per-AM flag in pg_am. We could always complicate matters later. (Of course, this is all hypothetical since no patch is on the horizon...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: