Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions
От | damien clochard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 557EB041.9090409@dalibo.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions (Stéphane Schildknecht<stephane.schildknecht@postgres.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
>> > > Surprisingly, the author entitled the article "PostgreSQL to detect nuclear > explosions". But, the CEA is currently working on detecting and storing earth > movement (earthquakes for instance). > > I don't understand what this political and anti-nuclear thread is doing here. > I see nothing political in this thread. The question is "Do we want to associate publicly the PostgreSQL brand to the nuclear industry ?" and it as nothing to do with every one own opinion about nuclear energy. The fact is that nuclear power is a very controversial subject in Japan and in France, which are two big markets for PostgreSQL. And it's not a good idea to emphasize the use of PostgreSQL in this domain because a lot of media will associate "nuclear" with the idea of "dangerous", "unsafe", "weapons", etc. The original article is a perfect example of that semantic slippery slope... As you have noticed : the original call for tenders from CEA is about monitoring earthquakes, something rather positive... and yet what did the journalists choose as a title ? "PostgreSQL to detect nuclear explosions" From a PR standpoint, the nuclear industry is prone to sensationalist headlines and it is perceived as an dangerous, uncontrollable and waste-generating industry by a lot of people. Which are exactly the opposite of the values we want to associate PostgreSQL with.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: