Re: Outstanding patches
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Outstanding patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5578.1036646825@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Outstanding patches (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Outstanding patches
Re: Outstanding patches Re: Outstanding patches |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I will be applying outstanding 7.4 patches on Friday: > http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 > If anyone wants those rejected/modified, please let me know. array upper/lower bound: missing doc updates, otherwise seems okay. \pset pager always: I thought we had rejected that idea in favor of making the whether-to-use-pager decision pay attention to width as well as number of lines. temp tables: difficult to comment on a message that does not include the proposed patch. CLUSTER ALL patch: I have a problem with this, specifically the fact that it changes CLUSTER into a multi-transaction operation. That renders CLUSTER non-rollbackable and not callable from functions. After all the work we went to to make CLUSTER rollbackable, this seems like a giant step backward. CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion? I seem to recall some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we resolved them. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: