Re: nested loop semijoin estimates
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: nested loop semijoin estimates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 556CEF03.2030201@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | nested loop semijoin estimates (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: nested loop semijoin estimates
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/01/2015 03:22 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > On 06/01/15 23:47, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 06/01/2015 02:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Anybody else want to speak for or against back-patching the patch as >>> posted? I intentionally didn't push it in before today's releases, >>> but I will push it later this week if there are not objections. >> >> I would like Mark Wong to test this on DBT3, if that's possible for him. >> I'm very worried about an unanticipated regression. > > AFAIK Mark is busy with other stuff at the moment, but I can do the > TPC-H (which DBT3 is equal to, IIRC). Yeah, I just want something which has a chance of catching unanticipated regression in queries which should be unaffected by the patch. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: