Re: nested loop semijoin estimates
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: nested loop semijoin estimates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 556A278E.1010703@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: nested loop semijoin estimates (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/30/15 21:50, Tom Lane wrote: > So what this seems to mean is that for SEMI/ANTI join cases, we have > to postpone all of the inner scan cost determination to > final_cost_nestloop, so that we can do this differently depending on > whether has_indexed_join_quals() is true. That's a little bit > annoying because it will mean we take the shortcut exit less often; > but since SEMI/ANTI joins aren't that common, it's probably not > going to be a big planning time hit. Yay! So I wasn't entirely wrong on this. Do you plan to make this change, or will you leave that on me? > > Not sure yet about your other point about the indexscan getting > rejected too soon. That doesn't seem to be happening for me, at least > not in HEAD. FWIW I can reproduce that reliably on current HEAD, with the test case I sent yesterday. I'm using default config (as produced by initdb). regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: