Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55677680.5080900@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/28/2015 04:05 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 05/28/2015 12:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: >> JD, > >> What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar, >> and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into >> it are. With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib >> if it should go into the 'extensions' directory. I'm not sure that we >> would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which >> are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory. > > I am suggesting that things like citext be made a type proper. No > install required. This seems to come up regularly. Maybe we should put it in an FAQ somewhere. The barriers to making non-core types into core types are very very high, possibly insurmountable. This is pretty much not an option. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: